From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Doctor v. State

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fifth District.
Dec 13, 2019
285 So. 3d 387 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2019)

Opinion

Case No. 5D18-3139

12-13-2019

Armando J. DOCTOR, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.

James S. Purdy, Public Defender, and Kathryn Rollison Radtke, Assistant Public Defender, Daytona Beach, for Appellant. Ashley Moody, Attorney General, Tallahassee, and Kellie A. Nielan, Assistant Attorney General, Daytona Beach, for Appellee.


James S. Purdy, Public Defender, and Kathryn Rollison Radtke, Assistant Public Defender, Daytona Beach, for Appellant.

Ashley Moody, Attorney General, Tallahassee, and Kellie A. Nielan, Assistant Attorney General, Daytona Beach, for Appellee.

PER CURIAM.

Armando Doctor appeals the judgment and sentence entered after a jury found him guilty of robbery. We affirm in all respects, but remand for entry of a nunc pro tunc written order adjudicating him competent to proceed based upon the court's independent determination of Doctor's competency. See Hendrix v. State, 224 So. 3d 823, 824 (Fla. 2d DCA 2017).

AFFIRMED; REMANDED with instructions.

EVANDER, C.J., HARRIS and GROSSHANS, JJ., concur.


Summaries of

Doctor v. State

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fifth District.
Dec 13, 2019
285 So. 3d 387 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2019)
Case details for

Doctor v. State

Case Details

Full title:Armando J. DOCTOR, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.

Court:District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fifth District.

Date published: Dec 13, 2019

Citations

285 So. 3d 387 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2019)