From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Dixon v. Groeger

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF MAINE
Oct 3, 2016
Docket no. 2:16-cv-178-NT (D. Me. Oct. 3, 2016)

Opinion

Docket no. 2:16-cv-178-NT

10-03-2016

RICHARD ALLEN DIXON, JR., Plaintiff, v. DALTON GROEGER, Defendant.


ORDER AFFIRMING THE RECOMMENDED DECISION OF THE MAGISTRATE JUDGE

On August 29, 2016, the United States Magistrate Judge filed with the court, with copies to the parties, his Recommended Decision on Plaintiff's Motion to Dismiss (ECF No. 20). The time within which to file objections expired on September 15, 2016 and no objections have been filed. The Magistrate Judge notified the parties that failure to object would waive their right to de novo review and appeal.

It is therefore ORDERED that the Recommended Decision of the Magistrate Judge is hereby AFFIRMED and ADOPTED. The Defendant's Motion to Dismiss is DENIED.

SO ORDERED.

/s/ Nancy Torresen

United States Chief District Judge Dated this 3rd day of October, 2016.


Summaries of

Dixon v. Groeger

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF MAINE
Oct 3, 2016
Docket no. 2:16-cv-178-NT (D. Me. Oct. 3, 2016)
Case details for

Dixon v. Groeger

Case Details

Full title:RICHARD ALLEN DIXON, JR., Plaintiff, v. DALTON GROEGER, Defendant.

Court:UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF MAINE

Date published: Oct 3, 2016

Citations

Docket no. 2:16-cv-178-NT (D. Me. Oct. 3, 2016)

Citing Cases

Ainooson v. O'Gara

Further, even assuming that the denial of the request does not amount to an adverse action, Defendant Lynds's…