From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Dixie Auto Transp. Co. Inc. v. Louttit

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District
Nov 1, 1991
588 So. 2d 68 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1991)

Opinion

No. 90-03667.

November 1, 1991.

Appeal from nonfinal order of the Circuit Court for Polk County; Joe E. Young, Jr., Judge.

Shelley H. Leinicke, Wicker, Smith, Tutan, O'Hara, McCoy, Graham Lane, Fort Lauderdale, for appellants.

Charles T. Canady and Donald G. Jacobsen, Lane, Trohn, Clarke, Bertrand Williams, P.A., Lakeland, for appellee.


The appellants contend the trial court erred in granting summary judgment in favor of the appellee on the basis of collateral estoppel. The appellants argue the defensive use of collateral estoppel is inappropriate where there is no mutuality of parties. We disagree and affirm based on Zeidwig v. Ward, 548 So.2d 209 (Fla. 1989), and Verhagen v. Arroyo, 552 So.2d 1162 (Fla. 3d DCA 1989).

RYDER, A.C.J., and PATTERSON, J., concur.


Summaries of

Dixie Auto Transp. Co. Inc. v. Louttit

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District
Nov 1, 1991
588 So. 2d 68 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1991)
Case details for

Dixie Auto Transp. Co. Inc. v. Louttit

Case Details

Full title:DIXIE AUTO TRANSPORT COMPANY, INC. AND WENDOL D. PHELPS, APPELLANTS, v…

Court:District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District

Date published: Nov 1, 1991

Citations

588 So. 2d 68 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1991)

Citing Cases

United Services Automobile Ass'n v. Selz

The current writings on the issue of defensive collateral estoppel have properly arisen at the appellate…

Lee v. Gadasa Corp.

The trial court then applied the doctrine of collateral estoppel to resolve the question of the validity of a…