From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Dittenfass v. Horsley

Court of Appeals of the State of New York
Jun 11, 1918
120 N.E. 861 (N.Y. 1918)

Opinion

Argued May 28, 1918

Decided June 11, 1918

Max D. Steuer and Henry Danziger for appellant.

Samuel F. Moran and Henry G. Gennert for respondents.


Orders affirmed, with costs; no opinion.

Concur: HISCOCK, Ch. J., CHASE, HOGAN, POUND, McLAUGHLIN, CRANE and ANDREWS, JJ.


Summaries of

Dittenfass v. Horsley

Court of Appeals of the State of New York
Jun 11, 1918
120 N.E. 861 (N.Y. 1918)
Case details for

Dittenfass v. Horsley

Case Details

Full title:MARK M. DITTENFASS, Appellant, v . DAVID HORSLEY et al., Respondents…

Court:Court of Appeals of the State of New York

Date published: Jun 11, 1918

Citations

120 N.E. 861 (N.Y. 1918)
120 N.E. 861

Citing Cases

Schuyler v. Kirk-Brown Realty Co.

ling the demurrer has adopted the second line of reasoning set forth above. It would serve no useful purpose…

Schuyler v. Brown Realty Co.

As stated by Prof. Ames, supra (p. 376): "The reciprocity of remedy required is not the right of each party…