Opinion
Page 529e
236 Cal.App.4th 529e __ Cal.Rptr.3d __ DISPUTESUITE.COM, LLC, Plaintiff and Respondent, v. SCOREINC. COM et al, Defendants and Appellants. No. B248694. California Court of Appeals, Second District, Second Division April 14, 2015THE COURT:
IT IS ORDERED that the opinion filed herein on April 14, 2015, 235 Cal.App.4th 1261, ___ Cal.Rptr.3d ___ be modified as follows and the petition for rehearing is DENIED:
On page 2, the second sentence of the fourth full paragraph [235 Cal.App.4th 1263, advance report, 3d opinion par., line 4], the words “At defendants’ insistence, ” are deleted so the sentence now reads:
The master reseller agreement contains a forum-selection clause by which “any disputes, actions, claims or causes of action arising out of or in connection with this Agreement or the Service shall be subject to the exclusive jurisdiction of the state and federal courts located in Hillsb[o]rough, Florida.”
On page 9, the second sentence of the first full paragraph [235 Cal.App.4th 1268, advance report, 3d full par., line 31, the words “they chose” are changed to “to which they agreed” so the sentence now reads:
But defendants cannot be heard to complain about a forum to which they agreed.
There is no change in the judgment.
Appellants’ petition for rehearing is denied.