holding that "one reasonably could conclude that a person without a fixed, regular place to sleep does not have a residence under the terms of the statute. Persons of common intelligence must necessarily guess as to the types of living situations that the term ‘residence’ encompasses. Because of these defects, the term ‘failure to register’ lacks sufficient definiteness as to the proscribed conduct."
Summary of this case from State v. LaFountain2000.
holding that "one reasonably could conclude that a person without a fixed, regular place to sleep does not have a residence under the terms of the statute. Persons of common intelligence must necessarily guess as to the types of living situations that the term ‘residence’ encompasses. Because of these defects, the term ‘failure to register’ lacks sufficient definiteness as to the proscribed conduct."
Summary of this case from State v. LaFountainFull title:DISPOSITIONS OF PETITIONS FOR REVIEW
Court:The Supreme Court of Washington
Date published: Jan 1, 2000
Factual findings are considered under the substantial evidence standard, and conclusions of law are reviewed…
State v. TurnerThis Court granted the State's petition for review of the Court of Appeals' decision. State v. Turner, 141…