concluding that testimony that defendant accused of theft by deception had written a bad check in payment of amounts loaned to him was admissible even though he was not charged with theft regarding that transaction
Summary of this case from Com. v. Fisher1991
concluding that testimony that defendant accused of theft by deception had written a bad check in payment of amounts loaned to him was admissible even though he was not charged with theft regarding that transaction
Summary of this case from Com. v. FisherFull title:DISPOSITIONS OF PETITIONS FOR ALLOWANCE OF APPEAL
Court:Supreme Court of Pennsylvania
Date published: Jan 1, 1991
¶ 7 The cases addressing and accepting the science behind the conversion of a serum/plasma alcohol content…
Com. v. LoeperThe Commonwealth made no attempt to have Dr. Stuard relate the blood test results back to the time when…