Opinion
1992.
(73658) People v. Storms 225 Ill. App.3d 558 .................................... Allowed.
(74019) People v. Stover Rule 23 Order No. 1-90-0146, filed 06/15/92 ............. Denied.
(74038) People v. Street Rule 23 Order No. 1-89-2672, filed 06/26/92 ............. Denied.
(73574) People v. Strickland Rule 23 Orders Nos. 2-90-1167, 2-90-1168, filed 03/17/92 .......................................... Denied.
(73761) People v. Stupka No. 2-90-0833, filed 03/25/92 ........................... Denied.
(74109) People v. Sutton No. 4-91-0696, filed 06/11/92 ........................... Denied.
(74146) People v. Swofford Rule 23 Order No. 5-89-0362, filed 07/10/92 ............. Denied.
(73712) People v. Thomas, Michael No. 1-89-0454, filed 04/23/92 ........................... Denied.
(73603) People v. Thomas, Oily Rule 23 Orders Nos. 1-89-2735, 1-90-2566, filed 03/27/92 .......................................... Denied.
(73907) People v. Thompson No. 3-91-0229, filed 05/22/92 ........................... Denied.
(73592) People v. Tillman No. 1-88-0737, filed 12/27/91 ........................... Denied.
(73913) People v. Torres Rule 23 Order No. 1-89-1889, filed 04/20/92 ............. Denied.
(74026) People v. Truly No. 1-88-3149, filed 06/17/92 ........................... Denied.
(71820) People v. Tyson 211 Ill. App.3d 1106 ................................... Allowed.
(Above consolidated with cause Nos. 71542, 72736, 72929, 73108.)
The parties are directed to address only the issue of whether State and Federal double jeopardy principles prohibit a second hearing on Class X eligibility or habitual criminal status where the record of the first sentencing hearing did not sufficiently establish such eligibility or status.