Summary
explaining that "a trial court is not required to justify a decision to sentence a defendant within the presumptive range by making findings of aggravation and mitigation"
Summary of this case from State v. StameyOpinion
1999
From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research
Disposition of Petitions for Discretionary Review
Supreme Court of North Carolina
Jan 1, 1999
351 N.C. 111 (N.C. 1999)
Summaries of
Disposition of Petitions for Discretionary Review
Supreme Court of North Carolina
Jan 1, 1999
351 N.C. 111 (N.C. 1999)
explaining that "a trial court is not required to justify a decision to sentence a defendant within the presumptive range by making findings of aggravation and mitigation"
Summary of this case from State v. StameyCase details for
Disposition of Petitions for Discretionary Review
Case Details
Full title:DISPOSITION OF PETITIONS FOR DISCRETIONARY REVIEW
Court:Supreme Court of North Carolina
Date published: Jan 1, 1999
Citations
351 N.C. 111 (N.C. 1999)
Citing Cases
State v. Wilson
State v. Chavis, 141 N.C. App. 553, 568, 540 S.E.2d 404, 415 (2000) (quoting State v. Caldwell, 125 N.C. App.…
State v. WilliamsonEven if Detective Grant's statements should not have been admitted, we find no prejudicial error in light of…