From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Disposition of Petitions for Discretionary Review

Supreme Court of North Carolina
May 9, 2002
355 N.C. 493 (N.C. 2002)

Opinion


563 S.E.2d 572 (N.C. 2002) 355 N.C. 493 Harold F. PRIOR and Paulette M. Prior, Co-Administrators of the Estate of Shawn Kelly Prior, Deceased, as Administrators, and on their own behalf v. James Earl PRUETT, individually and in his official capacity as deputy of the Burke County Sheriff's Department; Steven Scott Rogers, individually and in his official capacity as deputy of the Burke County Sheriff's Department; Lyle Dean Garland, individually and in his official capacity as a deputy of Burke County Sheriff's Department; Ralph Johnson, individually and in his official capacity as Sheriff of Burke County; and Burke County, a body politic and corporate. No. 367P01. Supreme Court of North Carolina May 9, 2002.

        G. Michael Barnhill, W. Clark Goodman, Scott D. MacLatchie, Charlotte, for Pruett et al.

        C. Frank Goldsmith, Marion, for Priors.

        Louis L. Lesesne, Jr., Charlotte, Richard L. Hattendorf, for Fraternal Order of Police.

        Prior report: 143 N.C.App. 612, 550 S.E.2d 166.

        ORDER

        Upon consideration of the petition filed by Defendants in this matter for discretionary review of the decision of the North Carolina Court of Appeals pursuant to G.S. 7A-31, the following order was entered and is hereby certified to the North Carolina Court of Appeals:

"Denied by order of the Court in conference, this the 9th day of May 2002."


Summaries of

Disposition of Petitions for Discretionary Review

Supreme Court of North Carolina
May 9, 2002
355 N.C. 493 (N.C. 2002)
Case details for

Disposition of Petitions for Discretionary Review

Case Details

Full title:DISPOSITION OF PETITIONS FOR DISCRETIONARY REVIEW

Court:Supreme Court of North Carolina

Date published: May 9, 2002

Citations

355 N.C. 493 (N.C. 2002)
355 N.C. 493
563 S.E.2d 190

Citing Cases

Williams v. City of Jacksonville Police Dep't

"`In a negligence action, a law enforcement officer is held to the standard of care that a reasonably prudent…

Wilcox v. City of Asheville

There is a question of fact as to whether Gonce could have timely moved from his position in front of his car…