From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Disciplinary Counsel v. O'Malley

Supreme Court of Ohio.
Oct 20, 2016
2016 Ohio 7387 (Ohio 2016)

Opinion

No. 2012–2070.

10-20-2016

DISCIPLINARY COUNSEL v. O'MALLEY.


{¶ 1} This cause came on for further consideration upon the filing on January 27, 2016, of a petition for reinstatement by respondent, Joseph Patrick O'Malley, Attorney Registration No. 0060087. In accordance with Gov.Bar R. V(25)(E), respondent's petition for reinstatement was referred to the Board of Professional Conduct. The board filed its final report in this court on August 8, 2016, recommending that respondent be reinstated to the practice of law in Ohio. No objections to the final report were filed, and this cause was considered by the court.

{¶ 2} Upon consideration thereof, it is ordered by this court that the petition for reinstatement of respondent is granted and that respondent, Joseph Patrick O'Malley, last known address in Westlake, Ohio, is reinstated to the practice of law in Ohio.{¶ 3} It is further ordered by the court that respondent be taxed the costs of these proceedings in the amount of $1,228.55, less the deposit of $500.00, for a total balance due of $728.55 payable, by cashier's check or money order, by respondent on or before 90 days from the date of this order. If costs are not paid on or before 90 days from the date of this order, interest at the rate of 10 per cent per annum will accrue until costs are paid in full. It is further ordered that if costs are not paid in full on or before 90 days from the date of this order, the matter may be referred to the attorney general for collection and respondent may be found in contempt and suspended until all costs and accrued interest are paid in full. It is further ordered that respondent is liable for all collections costs pursuant to R.C. 131.02 if the debt is certified to the attorney general for collection.

{¶ 4} It is further ordered by the court that within 90 days of the date of this order respondent shall reimburse any amounts that have been awarded against respondent by the Lawyers' Fund for Client Protection pursuant to Gov.Bar R. VIII(7)(F). It is further ordered by the court that if after the date of this order the Lawyers' Fund for Client Protection awards any amount against respondent pursuant to Gov.Bar R. VIII(7)(F), respondent shall reimburse that amount to the Lawyers' Fund for Client Protection within 90 days of the notice of such award.

{¶ 5} It is further ordered that the clerk of this court issue certified copies of this order as provided for in Gov.Bar R. V(17)(D)(1) and that publication be made as provided for in Gov.Bar R. V(17)(D)(2).

{¶ 6} For earlier case, see Disciplinary Counsel v. O'Malley, 137 Ohio St.3d 161, 2013-Ohio-4566, 998 N.E.2d 470.

O'CONNOR, C.J., and PFEIFER, O'DONNELL, LANZINGER, KENNEDY, FRENCH, and O'NEILL, JJ., concur.


Summaries of

Disciplinary Counsel v. O'Malley

Supreme Court of Ohio.
Oct 20, 2016
2016 Ohio 7387 (Ohio 2016)
Case details for

Disciplinary Counsel v. O'Malley

Case Details

Full title:DISCIPLINARY COUNSEL v. O'MALLEY.

Court:Supreme Court of Ohio.

Date published: Oct 20, 2016

Citations

2016 Ohio 7387 (Ohio 2016)
64 N.E.3d 990
2016 Ohio 7387