From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Disciplinary Counsel v. Mahin

SUPREME COURT OF OHIO
Nov 14, 2016
2016 Ohio 7717 (Ohio 2016)

Opinion

No. 2015–1641.

11-14-2016

DISCIPLINARY COUNSEL v. MAHIN.


{¶ 1} This cause came on for further consideration upon the filing of an application for reinstatement by respondent, John Edward Mahin, Attorney Registration No. 0011253, last known business address in Cincinnati, Ohio.

{¶ 2} The court coming now to consider its order of June 14, 2016, wherein the court, pursuant to Gov.Bar R. V(12)(A)(3), suspended respondent from the practice of law for a period of two years with one year stayed on conditions and with credit for the time served under the interim felony suspension imposed on January 9, 2015, finds that respondent has substantially complied with that order and with the provisions of Gov.Bar R. V(24).

{¶ 3} Therefore, it is ordered by this court that respondent is reinstated to the practice of law in the state of Ohio. It is further ordered that in accordance with Gov.Bar R. V(21) and consistent with the opinion rendered herein on June 14, 2016, respondent shall serve two years of monitored probation.

{¶ 4} It is further ordered that on or before 30 days from the date of this order relator shall file with the clerk of this court the name of the attorney who will serve as respondent's monitor, in accordance with Gov.Bar R. V(21)(A)(3). It is further ordered that at the end of respondent's probationary period, relator shall file with the clerk of this court a report indicating whether respondent, during the probationary period, complied with the terms of the probation.

{¶ 5} It is further ordered that at the end of the probationary period respondent may apply for termination of probation as provided in Gov.Bar R. V(21). It is further ordered that respondent's probation shall not be terminated until (1) respondent files an application for termination of probation in compliance with Gov.Bar R. V(21)(D), (2) respondent complies with this and all other orders issued by this court, (3) respondent complies with the Rules for the Government of the Bar of Ohio, (4) relator files with the clerk of this court a report indicating that respondent has complied with the terms of the probation, and (5) this court orders that the probation be terminated.

{¶ 6} It is further ordered that the clerk of this court issue certified copies of this order as provided for in Gov.Bar R. V(17)(D)(1) and that publication be made as provided for in Gov.Bar R. V(17)(D)(2).

{¶ 7} For earlier case, see Disciplinary Counsel v. Mahin, 146 Ohio St.3d 312, 2016-Ohio-3336, 55 N.E.3d 1108.

O'CONNOR, C.J., and PFEIFER, O'DONNELL, LANZINGER, KENNEDY, FRENCH, and O'NEILL, JJ., concur.


Summaries of

Disciplinary Counsel v. Mahin

SUPREME COURT OF OHIO
Nov 14, 2016
2016 Ohio 7717 (Ohio 2016)
Case details for

Disciplinary Counsel v. Mahin

Case Details

Full title:DISCIPLINARY COUNSEL v. MAHIN.

Court:SUPREME COURT OF OHIO

Date published: Nov 14, 2016

Citations

2016 Ohio 7717 (Ohio 2016)
66 N.E.3d 758
2016 Ohio 7717

Citing Cases

Dayton Bar Ass'n v. Sullivan

eland Metro. Bar Assn. v. Sleibi , 144 Ohio St.3d 257, 2015-Ohio-2724, 42 N.E.3d 699, ¶ 31, reinstatement…

Cincinnati Bar Ass'n v. Mahin

At that time, he began serving a two-year period of monitored probation, which was a condition of the stay on…