Opinion
No. DD 87-28
Submitted May 1, 1996 —
Decided May 7, 1996.
ON PETITION FOR REINSTATEMENT.
This cause came on for further consideration upon the filing of a petition for reinstatement by respondent, Conrad Ashling Curren. In accordance with Gov.Bar R. V(10)(F), respondent's petition for reinstatement was referred to the Board of Commissioners on Grievances and Discipline of the Supreme Court. The Board of Commissioners on Grievances and Discipline filed its Final Report in this court on March 7, 1996, recommending that Conrad Ashling Curren be reinstated to the practice of law in the state of Ohio. No objections to said Final Report were filed.
The court now considers its order of October 12, 1988, indefinitely suspending respondent, Conrad Ashling Curren, from the practice of law pursuant to former Gov.Bar R. V(7)(b) (now Gov.Bar R. V[6][B][2]). On consideration thereof, and the Final Report of the Board of Commissioners on Grievances and Discipline,
IT IS ORDERED by the court that the respondent, Conrad Ashling Curren, Attorney Registration No. 0006247, last known address in Greenfield, Ohio, be, and hereby is, reinstated to the practice of law in Ohio.
IT IS FURTHER ORDERED by the court that respondent be taxed the costs of these proceedings in the amount $425.98, less the deposit of $500, for a total overage of $74.02, which overage shall be refunded to respondent.
IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that the Clerk of this court issue certified copies of this order as provided for in Gov.Bar R. V(8)(D)(1), that publication be made as provided for in Gov.Bar R. V(8)(D)(2), and that respondent bear the costs of publication.
For earlier case, see Disciplinary Counsel v. Curren (1988), 39 Ohio St.3d 117, 529 N.E.2d 930.
MOYER, C.J., DOUGLAS, RESNICK, F.E. SWEENEY, PFEIFER, COOK and STRATTON, JJ., concur.