From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Dirk v. State

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fifth District
Nov 30, 2007
969 So. 2d 1170 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2007)

Opinion

No. 5D06-3770.

November 30, 2007.

Appeal from the Circuit Court for Brevard County, Tonya Rainwater, Judge.

James S. Purdy, Public Defender, and Ailene S. Rogers, Assistant Public Defender, Daytona Beach, for Appellant.

Bill McCollum, Attorney General, Tallahassee, and Rebecca Roark Wall, Assistant Attorney General, Daytona Beach, for Appellee.


This court has previously held that the United States Supreme Court decisions in Apprendi v. New Jersey, 530 U.S. 466, 120 S.Ct. 2348, 147 L.Ed.2d 435 (2000) and Blakely v. Washington, 542 U.S. 296, 124 S.Ct. 2531, 159 L.Ed.2d 403 (2004) do not apply retroactively in those cases in which the convictions became final prior to the Apprendi decision, even though resentencing occurred post-Apprendi See Rouse v. State, 965 So.2d 201 (Fla. 5th DCA 2007); Langford v. State, 929 So.2d 598 (Fla. 5th DCA 2006). As we did in Langford, we certify conflict with Isaac v. State, 911 So.2d 813 (Fla. 1st DCA 2005).

AFFIRMED; CONFLICT CERTIFIED.

SAWAYA, TORPY and EVANDER, JJ., concur.


Summaries of

Dirk v. State

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fifth District
Nov 30, 2007
969 So. 2d 1170 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2007)
Case details for

Dirk v. State

Case Details

Full title:Gary M. DIRK, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee

Court:District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fifth District

Date published: Nov 30, 2007

Citations

969 So. 2d 1170 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2007)

Citing Cases

Dirk v. State

PER CURIAM.We have for review Dirk v. State, 969 So.2d 1170 (Fla. 5th DCA 2007), in which the Fifth District…