Summary
In Dinkens v. Attorney General, 285 F.2d 430 (5th Cir. 1961), the Fifth Circuit summarily affirmed the district court's "well-reasoned opinion" in the below case of Alabama ex rel. Gallion v. Rogers, 187 F. Supp. 848 (M.D. Ala. 1960).
Summary of this case from Leal v. AzarOpinion
Nos. 18562, 18585.
January 23, 1961.
Appeals from the United States District Court for the Middle District of Alabama; Frank M. Johnson, Jr., Judge.
Gordon Madison, Leslie Hall, Asst. Attys. Gen., Montgomery, Ala., MacDonald Gallion, Atty. Gen., Willard W. Livingston, Chief Asst. Atty. Gen., Montgomery, Ala., for appellants.
Harold R. Tyler, Jr., Asst. Atty. Gen., Dept. of Justice, Hartwell Davis, U.S. Atty., Montgomery, Ala., Harold H. Greene, Ben Brooks, Robert Owen, Howard A. Glickstein, Attys., Dept. of Justice, Washington, D.C., for appellees.
Before TUTTLE, Chief Judge, JONES, Circuit Judge, and MIZE, District Judge.
The judgments of the trial court in these two cases, consolidated for hearing on the trial, are hereby affirmed on the basis of the well reasoned opinion by the trial court. State of Alabama ex rel. Gallion v. Rogers, D.C., 187 F. Supp. 848.
Affirmed.