DiMeglio v. Slonk Construction Company

Full title: ANGELO DiMEGLIO, RESPONDENT, v. SLONK CONSTRUCTION COMPANY, APPELLANT

Court: Court of Errors and Appeals

Date published: Apr 21, 1939

5 A.2d 691 (N.J. 1939)

122 N.J.L. 379

Opinion

Submitted February 17, 1939 —

Decided April 21, 1939.

On appeal from the Supreme Court, whose opinion is reported in 121 N.J.L. 366.

For the respondent, George Pellettieri.

For the appellant, Samuel D. Lenox.

PER CURIAM.

The judgment under review herein should be affirmed, for the reasons expressed in the opinion delivered by Mr. Justice Heher in the Supreme Court.

For affirmance — THE CHANCELLOR, PARKER, CASE, DONGES, PERSKIE, PORTER, HETFIELD, DEAR, WELLS, WOLFSKEIL, RAFFERTY, HAGUE, JJ. 12.

For reversal — None.