From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Dime Savings Bank v. Anshel Realty Corp.

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
Jul 25, 1977
58 A.D.2d 881 (N.Y. App. Div. 1977)

Opinion

July 25, 1977


In a mortgage foreclosure action, defendants Dubroff and Messinger, as executors, appeal from so much of an order of the Supreme Court, Kings County, dated May 14, 1976, as directed that the receiver of the mortgaged premises pay the sum of $10,105.05 in his possession to the plaintiff. Order affirmed insofar as appealed from, without costs or disbursements. Subdivision 4 of section 1371 Real Prop. Acts. of the Real Property Actions and Proceedings Law is clear and unambiguous and mandates affirmance, however inequitable the result may be. Any relief required to prevent a recurrence of this situation must come through a legislative amendment to subdivision 4 of section 1371 Real Prop. Acts. of the Real Property Actions and Proceedings Law and not by judicial interpretation of that section. Latham, J.P., Shapiro, Hawkins and Suozzi, JJ., concur.


Summaries of

Dime Savings Bank v. Anshel Realty Corp.

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
Jul 25, 1977
58 A.D.2d 881 (N.Y. App. Div. 1977)
Case details for

Dime Savings Bank v. Anshel Realty Corp.

Case Details

Full title:DIME SAVINGS BANK OF WILLIAMSBURGH, Respondent, v. ANSHEL REALTY CORP. et…

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department

Date published: Jul 25, 1977

Citations

58 A.D.2d 881 (N.Y. App. Div. 1977)

Citing Cases

First National Bank & Trust Co. v. Hyman Novick Realty Corp.

The Legislature initially enacted the provisions of section 1371 providing the mechanics of deficiency…

Columbian Mut. Life v. Horizons of Schuyler

Order unanimously affirmed without costs. Memorandum: Because the amount of the judgment of foreclosure and…