Submitted October 23, 1989
Decided January 4, 1990
Motion for leave to appeal dismissed upon the ground that the Court of Appeals does not have jurisdiction to entertain a motion for leave to appeal from an order of the Appellate Division entered in an action commenced in the Civil Court of the City of New York (NY Const, art VI, § 3 [b] [ 7]; CPLR 5602 [a]).
Full title:EARL DILLMAN, Appellant, v. INTERNOTE USA INC., Respondent
Court:Court of Appeals of the State of New York
Date published: Jan 4, 1990
Although defendant contends that the first and second causes of action are barred by the statute of…
Harris v. Dutchess Cnty. Bd. of Coop. Educ. Servs.The court rejected the plaintiffs' claims as speculative, stating that "[t]he starting point of any such…