From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Dickson v. Carolina Casualty

Oregon Court of Appeals
Aug 21, 1991
814 P.2d 567 (Or. Ct. App. 1991)

Summary

In Dickson we simply reaffirmed, per curiam, our decision in Sibley v. City of Phoenix, 107 Or. App. 606, 610, 813 P.2d 69, rev den 312 Or. 527 (1991).

Summary of this case from Farmers Ins. Group v. Huff

Opinion

WCB 88-12834; CA A65175

Argued and submitted February 25, 1991

Affirmed August 21, 1991

Judicial Review from Workers' Compensation Board.

J. Michael Casey, Portland, argued the cause for petitioner. With him on the brief was Doblie Associates, Portland.

Mildred J. Carmack, Portland, argued the cause for respondent. With her on the brief was Schwabe, Williamson Wyatt, Portland.

Before Warren, Presiding Judge, and Riggs and Edmonds, Judges.


Affirmed. Sibley v. City of Phoenix, 107 Or. App. 606, 813 P.2d 69 (1991).


Summaries of

Dickson v. Carolina Casualty

Oregon Court of Appeals
Aug 21, 1991
814 P.2d 567 (Or. Ct. App. 1991)

In Dickson we simply reaffirmed, per curiam, our decision in Sibley v. City of Phoenix, 107 Or. App. 606, 610, 813 P.2d 69, rev den 312 Or. 527 (1991).

Summary of this case from Farmers Ins. Group v. Huff
Case details for

Dickson v. Carolina Casualty

Case Details

Full title:In the Matter of the Compensation of Ronald V. Dickson, Claimant. Ronald…

Court:Oregon Court of Appeals

Date published: Aug 21, 1991

Citations

814 P.2d 567 (Or. Ct. App. 1991)
814 P.2d 567

Citing Cases

Farmers Ins. Group v. Huff

The Board rejected Farmers' contention that this claim involved "a series of traumatic events" that…