From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Diaz v. Ralph

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
Oct 20, 2009
66 A.D.3d 819 (N.Y. App. Div. 2009)

Opinion

No. 2008-08441.

October 20, 2009.

In an action, inter alia, to recover damages for medical malpractice, etc., the defendant Head Neck Surgical Group, LLC, appeals from an order of the Supreme Court, Suffolk County (Rebolini, J.), dated July 15, 2008, which denied its motion to vacate so much of a prior order of the same court (Baisley, Jr., J.), dated February 19, 2008, as granted the plaintiff's unopposed motion for leave to enter a default judgment upon its failure to appear or answer the complaint.

Wilson Elser Moskowitz Edelman Dicker LLP, New York, N.Y. (Richard E Lerner and Patrick J. Lawless of counsel), for appellant.

Duffy Duffy, Uniondale, N.Y. (James N. LiCalzi of counsel), for respondents.

Before: Fisher, J.P., Florio, Angiolillo, Eng and Roman, JJ., concur.


Ordered that the order is affirmed, with costs.

To prevail on a motion to vacate its default, a defendant is required to demonstrate both a reasonable excuse therefor and a meritorious defense ( see CPLR 5015 [a] [1]; Fekete v Camp Skwere, 16 AD3d 544, 545; Amato v Fast Repair, Inc., 15 AD3d 429; Czarnik v Urban, 10 AD3d 627).

The determination of what constitutes a reasonable excuse lies within the trial court's discretion ( see Santiago v New York City Health Hosps. Corp., 10 AD3d 393, 394). Here, the appellant presented neither an acceptable excuse for its failure to timely serve an answer nor a meritorious defense. Accordingly, the Supreme Court did not improvidently exercise its discretion in denying the appellant's motion to vacate its default.


Summaries of

Diaz v. Ralph

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
Oct 20, 2009
66 A.D.3d 819 (N.Y. App. Div. 2009)
Case details for

Diaz v. Ralph

Case Details

Full title:MARCOS DIAZ et al., Respondents, v. STEPHEN RALPH et al., Defendants, and…

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department

Date published: Oct 20, 2009

Citations

66 A.D.3d 819 (N.Y. App. Div. 2009)
2009 N.Y. Slip Op. 7579
886 N.Y.S.2d 617

Citing Cases

Wells Fargo Bank v. Isaacs

. The court went on to hold that "an argument that a plaintiff lacks standing, if not asserted in the…

Wells Fargo Bank, N.A. v. Yanes

. The Appellate Division, Second Department further reasoned that "an argument that a plaintiff lacks…