Opinion
Decided July 9, 1992
The plaintiff's petition for certification for appeal from the Appellate Court, 27 Conn. App. 353, is granted, limited to the following question:
"In the circumstances of this case, was the plaintiff entitled to rescission and restitution relating to rescission because of the defendants' failure to disclose the existence of a service station in violation of General Statutes 22a-134 or 22a-134a or applicable administrative regulations?"
Kenneth J. McDonnell, in support of the petition.
Richard F. Paladino, in opposition.