holding that the mail fraud statute "punishes the scheme to defraud rather than the completed fraud itself."
Summary of this case from U.S. v. WitasickNo. 84-6891.
October 7, 1985, OCTOBER TERM, 1985.
C.A. 7th Cir. Certiorari denied. Reported below: 757 F. 2d 163.
holding that the mail fraud statute "punishes the scheme to defraud rather than the completed fraud itself."
Summary of this case from U.S. v. Witasickholding that the use of dual juries is not a per se violation of due process and that a criminal defendant must show some specific, undue prejudice to be entitled to relief
Summary of this case from Wilson v. Sirmonsholding that the use of dual juries is not a per se violation of due process and that a criminal defendant must show some specific, undue prejudice to be entitled to relief
Summary of this case from Brown v. Sirmonsstating that matters neither cited as error nor briefed on appeal are considered abandoned
Summary of this case from Rosado v. DetersFull title:DIAL ET AL. v. UNITED STATES
Court:U.S.
Date published: Oct 7, 1985
See Smith v. McCotter, 786 F.2d 697, 70203 (5th Cir. 1986); and Kelley v. State of Alabama, 636 F.2d 1082,…
U.S. v. BalderasA federal court must uphold a guilty plea challenged in a habeas corpus proceeding if the plea was knowing,…