From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Di Tommaso v. Syracuse University

Court of Appeals of the State of New York
May 2, 1916
112 N.E. 1072 (N.Y. 1916)

Opinion

Submitted April 14, 1916

Decided May 2, 1916

C.V. Byrne for appellant.

Harry E. Newell for respondent.


Order affirmed, with costs; first and second questions certified answered in the negative; remaining questions not answered; no opinion.

Concur: WILLARD BARTLETT, Ch. J., HISCOCK, COLLIN, SEABURY and POUND, JJ. Dissenting: CUDDEBACK and HOGAN, JJ.


Summaries of

Di Tommaso v. Syracuse University

Court of Appeals of the State of New York
May 2, 1916
112 N.E. 1072 (N.Y. 1916)
Case details for

Di Tommaso v. Syracuse University

Case Details

Full title:FRANCESCO DI TOMMASO, Respondent, v . SYRACUSE UNIVERSITY, Appellant

Court:Court of Appeals of the State of New York

Date published: May 2, 1916

Citations

112 N.E. 1072 (N.Y. 1916)
112 N.E. 1072

Citing Cases

Oltarsh v. Aetna Ins. Co.

(See Leotta v. Plessinger, 8 N.Y.2d 449, 461-462; Akin v. Lee, 206 N.Y. 20, 23, supra.) Where, however, the…