From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

D.G. v. State

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District
Nov 10, 1987
516 So. 2d 15 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1987)

Opinion

No. 87-69.

November 10, 1987.

An Appeal from the Circuit Court for Dade County; D. Bruce Levy, Judge.

Bennett H. Brummer, Public Defender, and Marti Rothenberg, Asst. Public Defender, for appellant.

Robert A. Butterworth, Atty. Gen., and Richard L. Polin, Asst. Atty. Gen., for appellee.

Before NESBITT, DANIEL S. PEARSON and JORGENSON, JJ.


The order under review which required that the juvenile and his parents make restitution to the victim of the juvenile's aggravated battery is reversed upon a holding that (a) the trial court failed to determine that the juvenile and his parents could be reasonably expected to pay the amount of restitution ordered, § 39.11(1), Fla. Stat. (Supp. 1986); O.L. v. State, 497 So.2d 971 (Fla. 3d DCA 1986); and (b) the order fails to specifically determine, as it must, the amount of restitution and the manner of payment and instead delegates this to the parties, O.L. v. State, 497 So.2d 971.

Reversed and remanded for further proceedings.


Summaries of

D.G. v. State

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District
Nov 10, 1987
516 So. 2d 15 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1987)
Case details for

D.G. v. State

Case Details

Full title:D.G., A JUVENILE, APPELLANT, v. THE STATE OF FLORIDA, APPELLEE

Court:District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District

Date published: Nov 10, 1987

Citations

516 So. 2d 15 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1987)

Citing Cases

In re Interest of J.M.

We agree. The inquiry is mandatory. D.G. v. State, 516 So.2d 15 (Fla. 3d DCA 1987). The court's failure to…