From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Devincentis v. Devincentis

Appellate Court of Connecticut
Dec 5, 1995
667 A.2d 570 (Conn. App. Ct. 1995)

Opinion

(13609)

Argued October 31, 1995

Decision released December 5, 1995

Action for the dissolution of a marriage, and for other relief, brought to the Superior Court in the judicial district of New Haven, where the defendant filed a counterclaim; thereafter, the matter was referred to Hon. Margaret C. Driscoll, state trial referee; judgment dissolving the marriage and granting certain other relief, from which the plaintiff appealed to this court; subsequently, the court, Bassick, J., granted the defendant's motion to find the plaintiff in contempt and ordered the plaintiff to make certain payments, and the plaintiff filed an amended appeal to this court. Affirmed.

James V. Somers, with whom, on the brief, were Suzanne L. McAlpine, and John J. Keefe, Jr., for the appellant (plaintiff).

James B. Streeto, for the appellee (defendant).


The plaintiff appeals from a judgment of dissolution. This appeal can best be categorized as a valiant but futile effort to retry the case in this court. No novel principles of law or appellate procedures are involved and to discuss the defendant's claim would serve no good purpose. See Byrne v. Trice, 170 Conn. 442, 365 A.2d 1063 (1976).


Summaries of

Devincentis v. Devincentis

Appellate Court of Connecticut
Dec 5, 1995
667 A.2d 570 (Conn. App. Ct. 1995)
Case details for

Devincentis v. Devincentis

Case Details

Full title:MICHAEL DEVINCENTIS v. VALERIE DEVINCENTIS

Court:Appellate Court of Connecticut

Date published: Dec 5, 1995

Citations

667 A.2d 570 (Conn. App. Ct. 1995)
39 Conn. App. 931

Citing Cases

Lord v. Lord

No novel principles of law or appellate procedures are involved, and to discuss these claims would serve no…