From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

DeVargas v. State

Supreme Court of New Mexico
Mar 4, 1982
97 N.M. 563 (N.M. 1982)

Summary

In DeVargas v. New Mexico, 97 N.M. 563, 642 P.2d 166 (1982), the New Mexico Supreme Court ruled that the plaintiff's § 1983 action was barred by the two year statute of limitations contained in § 41-4-15(A) of the New Mexico Tort Claims Act.

Summary of this case from Mulligan v. Hazard

Opinion

No. 13965.

February 22, 1982. Rehearing Denied March 4, 1982.

Appeal from the District Court, Santa Fe County, Lorenzo F. Garcia, D. J.

Singleton Roberts-Hohl, Sarah Michael Singleton, Santa Fe, Richard Rosenstock, Chama, Sena Herrera, Robert Sena, Santa Fe, for petitioner.

Jeff Bingaman, Atty. Gen., Ralph Muxlow, Asst. Atty. Gen., Santa Fe, Rodey, Dickason, Sloan, Akin Robb, Mark C. Meiering, Albuquerque, for respondents.

John W. Cassell, Sp. Asst. Atty. Gen., Santa Fe, for amicus curiae State Police.


DECISION ON CERTIORARI


The opinion of the Court of Appeals was filed on October 1, 1981. 640 P.2d 1327. A petition for writ of certiorari was filed in this Court on November 9, 1981. Thereafter, the petition for writ of certiorari was granted on November 20, 1981.

After an exhaustive review of the transcripts, briefs and authorities, it is the decision of this Court that the petition for writ of certiorari heretofore granted be quashed as improvidently issued.

Under Section 42 U.S.C. § 1983, the statute of limitations applicable is that which applies to the most closely analogous cause of action under state law.

In Board of Regents v. Tomanio, 446 U.S. 478, 100 S.Ct. 1790, 64 L.Ed.2d 440 (1980), the Supreme Court of the United States clearly stated that lower federal courts must look to and apply the state statute of limitations governing the state cause of action provided by state law which is most closely analogous to Section 42 U.S.C. § 1983 and which is not inconsistent with the Constitution and Laws of the United States.

Under New Mexico law, the most closely analogous state cause of action is provided for by the New Mexico Tort Claims Act under Section 41-4-12, N.M.S.A. 1978. The statute of limitations applicable to a cause of action under Section 41-4-12 is set forth in Section 41-4-15, N.M.S.A. 1978. Under Section 41-4-15, the action must be commenced within two years after the occurrence which results in the injury.

The original complaint failed to state a claim upon which relief could be granted. McClelland v. Facteau, 610 F.2d 693 (10th Cir. 1979). The amendment to the complaint which was filed after the two-year statute of limitations had run did not relate back to the original filing since the original complaint did not state a cause of action. N.M.R.Civ.P. 15(c), N.M.S.A. 1978.

IT IS SO ORDERED.

EASLEY, C. J., and PAYNE and RIORDAN, JJ., concur.

SOSA, Senior Justice, not participating.


Summaries of

DeVargas v. State

Supreme Court of New Mexico
Mar 4, 1982
97 N.M. 563 (N.M. 1982)

In DeVargas v. New Mexico, 97 N.M. 563, 642 P.2d 166 (1982), the New Mexico Supreme Court ruled that the plaintiff's § 1983 action was barred by the two year statute of limitations contained in § 41-4-15(A) of the New Mexico Tort Claims Act.

Summary of this case from Mulligan v. Hazard

In DeVargas v. State, 97 N.M. 563, 642 P.2d 166 (1982), the New Mexico Supreme Court held that the two-year statute of limitations under the State Tort Claims Act was the controlling statute of limitations.

Summary of this case from Walker v. Maruffi
Case details for

DeVargas v. State

Case Details

Full title:Antonio "Ike" DeVARGAS, Petitioner, v. STATE of New Mexico, ex rel. NEW…

Court:Supreme Court of New Mexico

Date published: Mar 4, 1982

Citations

97 N.M. 563 (N.M. 1982)
642 P.2d 166

Citing Cases

Walker v. Maruffi

1986). After a hearing, the district court granted defendants' motion to dismiss, ruling that the case was…

DeVargas v. Montoya

The court eventually dismissed the action as time-barred, and that dismissal was, for practical purposes,…