From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Deutsche Bank v. Kirschenbaum

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
Oct 20, 2020
187 A.D.3d 569 (N.Y. App. Div. 2020)

Opinion

12100 Index No. 850141/14 Case No. 2020-00944

10-20-2020

DEUTSCHE BANK NATIONAL TRUST COMPANY, AS TRUSTEE FOR the HOLDERS OF NEW CENTURY HOME EQUITY LOAN TRUST, SERIES 2005–A, ASSET BACKED PASS–THROUGH CERTIFICATES, Plaintiff–Respondent, v. Joshua KIRSCHENBAUM, Defendant–Appellant, Winston Capital, LLC, et al., Defendants.

Richland & Falkowski, PLLC, Astoria (Michal Falkowski of counsel), for appellant. Davidson Fink LLP, Rochester (Richard N. Franco of counsel), for respondent.


Richland & Falkowski, PLLC, Astoria (Michal Falkowski of counsel), for appellant.

Davidson Fink LLP, Rochester (Richard N. Franco of counsel), for respondent.

Kapnick, J.P., Singh, Kennedy, Mendez, JJ.

Judgment of foreclosure and sale, Supreme Court, New York County (Arlene P. Bluth, J.), entered July 31, 2019, upon an order, same court (Judith N. McMahon, J.), entered August 6, 2018, which granted plaintiff's motion for summary judgment and an order of reference, confirming the referee's report on the amount due to plaintiff and awarding plaintiff damages in that amount, unanimously reversed, on the law, without costs, the judgment vacated, plaintiff's motion to confirm the referee's report and for a judgment of foreclosure and sale denied, and the matter remanded to the court for a new report computing the amount due to plaintiff.

The referee relied on an affidavit sworn to October 2, 2018 by an assistant vice president of plaintiff's loan servicer, who asserted that, according to the books and records of plaintiff pertaining to defendant's loan and payment history, defendant had been in default since March 1, 2009, and owed plaintiff the amount stated. However, because the books and records themselves were not submitted to the court, the affiant's assertions are inadmissible hearsay ( Nationstar Mtge., LLC v. Durane–Bolivard , 175 A.D.3d 1308, 1310–1311, 109 N.Y.S.3d 99 [2d Dept. 2019] ). Nor did the affiant lay a foundation for the introduction of the books and records as a business record (see CPLR 4518[a] ).

Contrary to defendant's contention, however, plaintiff established prima facie its entitlement to foreclosure by submitting evidence of the note and mortgage and proof of defendant's default, and defendant failed to raise an issue of fact (see Horizons Invs. Corp. v. Brecevich , 104 A.D.3d 475, 961 N.Y.S.2d 112 [1st Dept. 2013] ).


Summaries of

Deutsche Bank v. Kirschenbaum

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
Oct 20, 2020
187 A.D.3d 569 (N.Y. App. Div. 2020)
Case details for

Deutsche Bank v. Kirschenbaum

Case Details

Full title:Deutsche Bank National Trust Company, as Trustee for the Holders of New…

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

Date published: Oct 20, 2020

Citations

187 A.D.3d 569 (N.Y. App. Div. 2020)
187 A.D.3d 569
2020 N.Y. Slip Op. 5849

Citing Cases

U.S. Bank Nat'l Ass'n v. Chait

In his report of amount due upon the subject note and mortgage, the Referee relied on an April 13, 2018…