From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Detrich v. Ryan

United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit.
Oct 3, 2012
696 F.3d 1265 (9th Cir. 2012)

Opinion

No. 08–99001.

2012-10-3

David Scott DETRICH, Petitioner–Appellant, v. Charles L. RYAN, Director of Arizona Department of Corrections, Respondent–Appellee.

Jennifer Susan Bedier, Arizona Capital Representation Project, Tucson, AZ, Gregory Kuykendall, Kuykendall & Associates, Tucson, AZ, for Petitioner–Appellant. Kent Ernest Cattani, Chief Counsel, Arizona Attorney General's Office, Phoenix, AZ, for Respondent–Appellee.


Jennifer Susan Bedier, Arizona Capital Representation Project, Tucson, AZ, Gregory Kuykendall, Kuykendall & Associates, Tucson, AZ, for Petitioner–Appellant. Kent Ernest Cattani, Chief Counsel, Arizona Attorney General's Office, Phoenix, AZ, for Respondent–Appellee.
D.C. No. 4:03–cv–00229–DCB.

ORDER


KOZINSKI, Chief Judge:

Upon the vote of a majority of nonrecused active judges, it is ordered that this case be reheard en banc pursuant to Federal Rule of Appellate Procedure 35(a) and Ninth Circuit Rule 35–3. The three-judge panel opinion shall not be cited as precedent by or to any court of the Ninth Circuit.

Judge Hurwitz did not participate in the deliberations or vote as to whether the case should be taken en banc.


Summaries of

Detrich v. Ryan

United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit.
Oct 3, 2012
696 F.3d 1265 (9th Cir. 2012)
Case details for

Detrich v. Ryan

Case Details

Full title:David Scott DETRICH, Petitioner–Appellant, v. Charles L. RYAN, Director of…

Court:United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit.

Date published: Oct 3, 2012

Citations

696 F.3d 1265 (9th Cir. 2012)

Citing Cases

Jackson v. Warden, Lebanon Corr. Inst.

Note that this cited decision of the Ninth Circuit panel was vacated when the Ninth Circuit granted en banc…

Gutierrez v. Williams

The court of appeals since has granted en banc review, however, with the order providing that the panel…