From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Deschamps v. L. Bamberger Co.

Court of Errors and Appeals
Feb 8, 1943
30 A.2d 503 (N.J. 1943)

Opinion

Argued October 22, 1942 —

Decided February 8, 1943.

On appeal from the Supreme Court, whose opinion is reported in 128 N.J.L. 527.

For the respondents, John W. McGeehan, Jr.

For the appellant, George F. Lahey, Jr.


The judgment appealed from will be affirmed, for the reasons set forth in the opinion of the Supreme Court, with the reservation, however, that we do not consider or pass upon the points argued in the brief of appellant respecting alleged error committed by the trial court in certain rulings on evidence made during the course of the trial, and alleged error contained in the submission of the matter to the jury, for the reason that these points are not properly set forth in the grounds of appeal. Booth v. Keegan, 108 N.J.L. 538 .

The judgment appealed from is affirmed.

For affirmance — BODINE, DONGES, HEHER, PERSKIE, DEAR, RAFFERTY, HAGUE, THOMPSON, JJ. 8.

For reversal — THE CHANCELLOR, CASE, COLIE, WELLS, JJ. 4.


Summaries of

Deschamps v. L. Bamberger Co.

Court of Errors and Appeals
Feb 8, 1943
30 A.2d 503 (N.J. 1943)
Case details for

Deschamps v. L. Bamberger Co.

Case Details

Full title:ALICE DESCHAMPS AND DESIRE JOSEPH DESCHAMPS, PLAINTIFFS-RESPONDENTS, v. L…

Court:Court of Errors and Appeals

Date published: Feb 8, 1943

Citations

30 A.2d 503 (N.J. 1943)
30 A.2d 503

Citing Cases

O'Donnell v. Asplundh Tree Expert Co.

Although these conclusions dispose of the appeal, for the guidance of the court below on the retrial we will…

Hollander v. Smith Smith

In Belleville Stone Co. v. Comben, 61 N.J.L. 354 ( Sup. Ct. 1898); affirmed, 62 N.J.L. 449 ( E. A. 1898),…