Opinion
Civil Action 4:21-CV-03497
08-31-2022
URVASHI NAVIN DESAI, et al., Plaintiffs, v. MERRICK GARLAND, et al., Defendants.
ORDER
THE HONORABLE ALFRED H. BENNETT UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE
Before the Court are United States Magistrate Judge Yvonne Y. Ho's Memorandum and Recommendation filed on July 26, 2022 (Doc. #31), Defendants' Objections (Doc. #32), Plaintiffs' Objections (Doc. #33), and Defendants' Response (Doc. #34). The Magistrate Judge's findings and conclusions are reviewed de novo. Fed.R.Civ.P. 72(b); 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1); United States v. Wilson, 864 F.2d 1219,1221 (5th Cir. 1989). Having reviewed the parties' arguments and applicable legal authority, the Court adopts the Memorandum and Recommendation as this Court's Order.
Accordingly, Defendants' Motion to Dismiss (Docs. #13) is hereby GRANTED, Defendants' Motion for Leave to File Supplemental Response (Doc. #25) is hereby DENIED as moot, and Defendants' Motion to Strike (Doc. #17) and Motion to Reurge (Doc. #27) are hereby DENIED. This case is DISMISSED without prejudice to Plaintiffs refiling their claims if the removal proceedings are dismissed or otherwise resolved in their favor.
It is so ORDERED.