From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

DeRosier v. Crowley

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Fourth Department
Apr 19, 1996
226 A.D.2d 1117 (N.Y. App. Div. 1996)

Opinion

April 19, 1996

Appeal from the Supreme Court, Steuben County, Scudder, J.

Present — Green, J.P., Lawton, Wesley, Doerr and Boehm, JJ.


Order unanimously reversed on the law without costs, motion granted and complaint dismissed. Memorandum: "For plaintiff[s] to avoid dismissal of [their] action for failure to timely serve a complaint, [they] must demonstrate a reasonable excuse for [their] delay and establish the meritorious nature of [their] claim" ( Young v. Bassett Hosp., 190 A.D.2d 905; see, CPLR 3012 [b]; Fantauzzo v. Steimer, 193 A.D.2d 1125; Iafallo v. Dolan, 162 A.D.2d 965). Because plaintiffs proffered no excuse for their delay and failed to submit an affidavit of merit, Supreme Court erred in denying defendants' motion to dismiss ( see, Fantauzzo v Steimer, supra; Young v. Bassett Hosp., supra).


Summaries of

DeRosier v. Crowley

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Fourth Department
Apr 19, 1996
226 A.D.2d 1117 (N.Y. App. Div. 1996)
Case details for

DeRosier v. Crowley

Case Details

Full title:MARTIN DEROSIER et al., Respondents, v. JAMES CROWLEY et al., Appellants

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Fourth Department

Date published: Apr 19, 1996

Citations

226 A.D.2d 1117 (N.Y. App. Div. 1996)
642 N.Y.S.2d 834

Citing Cases

Ward v. Quick

Supreme Court granted the motion conditionally, giving plaintiff's 10 days from the order to serve a…