From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Department of Revenue v. Sheraton Bal Harbour Ass'n

District Court of Appeal of Florida, First District
Dec 18, 2003
864 So. 2d 454 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2003)

Opinion

Case No. 1D03-3933.

Opinion filed December 18, 2003. Rehearing Denied January 29, 2004.

Petition for Writ of Prohibition — Original Jurisdiction.

Charlie Crist, Attorney General, and Martha F. Barrera, Assistant Attorney General, Tallahassee, for petitioner.

Rex D. Ware and Elizabeth C. Daley of Steel, Hector Davis, LLP, Tallahassee, for respondent.


The Department of Revenue seeks a writ of prohibition to prevent the Division of Administrative Hearings ("DOAH") from proceeding with Sheraton's rule challenge to a repealed rule. The Department contends that section 120.56, Florida Statutes does not authorize a rule challenge to a rule that is no longer in existence, and therefore, DOAH is acting in excess of its jurisdiction. We agree and grant the petition. Because the court is confident that DOAH will promptly comply with this opinion, the court withholds formal issuance of the writ.

BARFIELD, ALLEN and DAVIS, JJ., concur.


Summaries of

Department of Revenue v. Sheraton Bal Harbour Ass'n

District Court of Appeal of Florida, First District
Dec 18, 2003
864 So. 2d 454 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2003)
Case details for

Department of Revenue v. Sheraton Bal Harbour Ass'n

Case Details

Full title:DEPARTMENT OF REVENUE, Petitioner, v. SHERATON BAL HARBOUR ASSOCIATION…

Court:District Court of Appeal of Florida, First District

Date published: Dec 18, 2003

Citations

864 So. 2d 454 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2003)

Citing Cases

Off. of Ins. Regulation v. Service in

This statute does not authorize a rule challenge to a rule that is no longer in existence. See id; Dep't of…