From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Dept. of Bkg. Fin. v. Martin Young

District Court of Appeal of Florida, First District
Apr 19, 1994
638 So. 2d 518 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1994)

Opinion

No. 93-730.

April 19, 1994.

An Appeal from an Order of the Division of Administrative Hearings.

Paul C. Stadler, Jr., Asst. Gen. Counsel, Tallahassee, for appellant.

Will J. Richardson, Richardson Law Offices, P.A., Tallahassee, for appellee.


We affirm the hearing officer's determination that the Department of Banking and Finance's proposed rule is invalid. We affirm on the ground that there was no statutory authority for the rule.

The parties are in agreement that the hearing officer's discussion of the law of garnishment in this context is incorrect since that remedy is not available against the State absent specific legislative authority. G J Investments v. Florida Department of Health and Rehabilitative Services, 429 So.2d 391 (Fla. 3d DCA 1983).

BOOTH, ALLEN and WEBSTER, JJ., concur.


Summaries of

Dept. of Bkg. Fin. v. Martin Young

District Court of Appeal of Florida, First District
Apr 19, 1994
638 So. 2d 518 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1994)
Case details for

Dept. of Bkg. Fin. v. Martin Young

Case Details

Full title:DEPARTMENT OF BANKING AND FINANCE, DIVISION OF FINANCING, APPELLANT, v…

Court:District Court of Appeal of Florida, First District

Date published: Apr 19, 1994

Citations

638 So. 2d 518 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1994)

Citing Cases

Martin Young Pvt. v. Dept. of Banking

The Division has no statutory authority to prioritize competing claims. See Department of Banking and…