From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Department of Corr. v. Chesnut

District Court of Appeal of Florida, First District
Jun 16, 2003
847 So. 2d 575 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2003)

Opinion

Case No. 1D03-1192.

Opinion filed June 16, 2003.

An appeal from the Public Employees Relations Commission.

Gary Lavon Grant, Assistant General Counsel, Tallahassee, for Appellant.

Ben R. Patterson of Patterson Traynham, Tallahassee, for Appellee.

Stephen A. Meck, and Jerry Chatham, Tallahassee, for Public Employees Relations Commission.


Upon consideration of the appellant's response to the Court's order of April 14, 2003, as well as the response filed by the Public Employees Relations Commission, the Court has determined that the order is not a final appealable order. See Dep't of Corrections v. Saulter, 751 So.2d 163 (Fla. 1st DCA 2000); see also Mathis v. Dep't of Corrections, 726 So.2d 389 (Fla. 1st DCA 1999). Accordingly, the appeal is dismissed for lack of jurisdiction.

ERVIN, KAHN and HAWKES, JJ., CONCUR.


Summaries of

Department of Corr. v. Chesnut

District Court of Appeal of Florida, First District
Jun 16, 2003
847 So. 2d 575 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2003)
Case details for

Department of Corr. v. Chesnut

Case Details

Full title:DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS, Appellant, v. BENNY CHESNUT, Appellee

Court:District Court of Appeal of Florida, First District

Date published: Jun 16, 2003

Citations

847 So. 2d 575 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2003)

Citing Cases

State v. Smith

This is not an appealable final order because the amount of back pay remains to be determined. See Dept of…