From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Department of Buildings v. Field

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, First Department
Oct 1, 1896
9 App. Div. 500 (N.Y. App. Div. 1896)

Opinion

October Term, 1896.

John Vinton Dahlgren, for the plaintiff.

George Hill, for the defendant.


In the condition of the agreed statement of facts as it is presented to us, this matter cannot be considered. It is specifically stated that Mr. Elbridge T. Gerry is the present owner of the premises mentioned in the submission. All that is stated with reference to the defendant Field, is, that he became the owner of the property in its existing condition; but that does not show that he is the owner of the property and that the proceeding is taken against the owner. As we are not authorized to draw any inferences or to import anything into the submission, we cannot act on these papers, but the matter may be resubmitted on a proper statement.

VAN BRUNT, P.J., BARRETT, RUMSEY and WILLIAMS, JJ., concurred.

Leave given to parties, if they shall be so advised, to file additional statement.


Summaries of

Department of Buildings v. Field

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, First Department
Oct 1, 1896
9 App. Div. 500 (N.Y. App. Div. 1896)
Case details for

Department of Buildings v. Field

Case Details

Full title:DEPARTMENT OF BUILDINGS OF THE CITY OF NEW YORK, Plaintiff, v . RICHARD…

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, First Department

Date published: Oct 1, 1896

Citations

9 App. Div. 500 (N.Y. App. Div. 1896)
41 N.Y.S. 1112

Citing Cases

Herkimer County L. P. Co. v. Johnson

In cases submitted, pursuant to article 2 of title 2 of chapter 11 (§§ 1279-1281) of the Code of Civil…