Denunzio v. Denunzio

Full title: Sharon DENUNZIO v. Peter DENUNZIO et al.

Court: Supreme Court of Connecticut.

Date published: Oct 15, 2014

101 A.3d 271 (Conn. 2014)

314 Conn. 926

Opinion

2014-10-15

Sharon DENUNZIO v. Peter DENUNZIO et al.

Michael P. Kaelin, Stamford, in support of the petition.

Michael P. Kaelin, Stamford, in support of the petition.

The plaintiff's petition for certification for appeal from the Appellate Court, 151 Conn.App. 403, 95 A.3d 557, is granted, limited to the following issues:

“1. Did the Appellate Court properly conclude that the trial court correctly used the ‘best interest of the conservatee’ standard as the basis for its decision?

“2. Did the Appellate Court properly determine that the trial court correctly ruled that the plaintiff's substantive rights were not prejudiced by the Probate Court's consideration of Attorney Richard J. Margenot's report, which was not admitted into evidence?”

ROGERS, C.J., did not participate in the consideration of or decision on this petition.