From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Denton v. C/O Bala

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
Jun 13, 2013
No. C 13-1374 SI (pr) (N.D. Cal. Jun. 13, 2013)
Download
PDF
Check
Treatment

Summary

requiring prisoner to descend stairs with hands cuffed behind back did not deny him a "minimal civilized measure of life's necessities"

Summary of this case from Apel v. Pike Cnty.
See 2 Summaries

Opinion

No. C 13-1374 SI (pr)

06-13-2013

BARRY G. DENTON, Plaintiff, v. C/O BALA; et al., Defendants.

SUSAN ILLSTON

JUDGMENT

This action is dismissed for failure to state a claim and without prejudice to plaintiff filing an action in state court.

IT IS SO ORDERED AND ADJUDGED.

___________________

SUSAN ILLSTON

United States District Judge

Summaries of

Denton v. C/O Bala

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
Jun 13, 2013
No. C 13-1374 SI (pr) (N.D. Cal. Jun. 13, 2013)

requiring prisoner to descend stairs with hands cuffed behind back did not deny him a "minimal civilized measure of life's necessities"

Summary of this case from Apel v. Pike Cnty.

stating that,"requiring the handcuffed inmate to descend a flight of stairs," without more facts showing defendants' deliberate indifference, is insufficient to state an Eighth Amendment violation

Summary of this case from Staunton v. Harrington
Case details for

Denton v. C/O Bala

Case Details

Full title:BARRY G. DENTON, Plaintiff, v. C/O BALA; et al., Defendants.

Court:UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

Date published: Jun 13, 2013

Citations

No. C 13-1374 SI (pr) (N.D. Cal. Jun. 13, 2013)

Citing Cases

Staunton v. Warden Thomas Core Civic Am. S.C.C.

Second, requiring an inmate to descend stairs while he is wearing restraints, without more, does not equate…

Staunton v. Harrington

Finally, as the Court has explained twice, requiring an inmate to descend stairs while he is wearing…

6 Citing Cases