From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Dent v. State

Court of Appeals of Georgia
Jul 15, 1976
228 S.E.2d 357 (Ga. Ct. App. 1976)

Opinion

52382.

SUBMITTED JULY 12, 1976.

DECIDED JULY 15, 1976.

Theft by taking. DeKalb Superior Court. Before Judge Allen.

Jonathan C. Peters, for appellant.

Richard Bell, District Attorney, Calvin A. Leipold, Assistant District Attorney, for appellee.


The defendant was convicted of theft by taking. On appeal he enumerates only that the court erred in denying his motion for continuance. Motions for continuance are within the discretionary ambit of the trial judge and, absent a clear showing of abuse, this court will not reverse for refusing to grant a continuance. Keller v. State, 128 Ga. App. 129, 131 ( 195 S.E.2d 767). No abuse of discretion has been shown.

Judgment affirmed. Clark and Stolz, JJ., concur.


SUBMITTED JULY 12, 1976 — DECIDED JULY 15, 1976.


Summaries of

Dent v. State

Court of Appeals of Georgia
Jul 15, 1976
228 S.E.2d 357 (Ga. Ct. App. 1976)
Case details for

Dent v. State

Case Details

Full title:DENT v. THE STATE

Court:Court of Appeals of Georgia

Date published: Jul 15, 1976

Citations

228 S.E.2d 357 (Ga. Ct. App. 1976)
139 Ga. App. 321

Citing Cases

Hammonds v. State

The granting of a motion for continuance is within the sound discretion of the trial judge, and this court…

Gaines v. State

"The grant of motions for continuance is within the sound discretion of the trial judge, and this court will…