From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

D'Emidio v. Williamsbridge Rest. Inc.

Supreme Court, Appellate Division, First Department, New York.
Feb 2, 2016
136 A.D.3d 406 (N.Y. App. Div. 2016)

Opinion

02-02-2016

Dawn Marie D'EMIDIO, et al., Plaintiffs–Respondents, v. WILLIAMSBRIDGE RESTAURANT INC. doing business as New Hawaii Sea Restaurant, Defendant–Appellant.

Law Offices of Michael E. Pressman, New York (Stuart B. Cholewa of counsel), for appellant. Law Office of Stephen B. Kaufman, P.C., Bronx (Stephen B. Kaufman of counsel), for respondents.


Law Offices of Michael E. Pressman, New York (Stuart B. Cholewa of counsel), for appellant.

Law Office of Stephen B. Kaufman, P.C., Bronx (Stephen B. Kaufman of counsel), for respondents.

Order, Supreme Court, Bronx County (Mary Ann Brigantti–Hughes, J.), entered July 16, 2014, which denied defendant's motion to dismiss the class action complaint pursuant to CPLR 3211(a)(7), unanimously affirmed, without costs.

The motion was properly denied. The allegations in the complaint sufficiently set forth factual allegations to arguably establish the class action prerequisites set forth in CPLR 901 and 902, at least to survive this dismissal motion (see Bernstein v. Kelso & Co., 231 A.D.2d 314, 323–324, 659 N.Y.S.2d 276 [1st Dept.1997] ; Ackerman v. New York Hosp. Med. Ctr. of Queens, 127 A.D.3d 794, 796, 7 N.Y.S.3d 327 [2d Dept.2015] ).

MAZZARELLI, J.P., RENWICK, MANZANET–DANIELS, KAPNICK, JJ., concur.


Summaries of

D'Emidio v. Williamsbridge Rest. Inc.

Supreme Court, Appellate Division, First Department, New York.
Feb 2, 2016
136 A.D.3d 406 (N.Y. App. Div. 2016)
Case details for

D'Emidio v. Williamsbridge Rest. Inc.

Case Details

Full title:Dawn Marie D'EMIDIO, et al., Plaintiffs–Respondents, v. WILLIAMSBRIDGE…

Court:Supreme Court, Appellate Division, First Department, New York.

Date published: Feb 2, 2016

Citations

136 A.D.3d 406 (N.Y. App. Div. 2016)
2016 N.Y. Slip Op. 619
23 N.Y.S.3d 877

Citing Cases

Brown v. S. Nassau Cmtys. Hosp.

Plaintiff is seeking to be paid the regular hourly rate for previously uncompensated time, alleging that she…