From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Demetri v. Mallari

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
Jun 10, 2002
295 A.D.2d 395 (N.Y. App. Div. 2002)

Opinion

2001-09646

Submitted May 9, 2002.

June 10, 2002.

In an action to recover damages for personal injuries, etc., the defendant appeals from an order of the Supreme Court, Nassau County (McCarty, J.), entered September 24, 2001, which granted the plaintiffs' motion for partial summary judgment on the issue of liability.

Cheven, Keely Hatzis (Jaffe Nohavicka, New York, N Y [David Allweiss] of counsel), for appellant.

Sawyer, Davis, Halpern Demetri, Garden City, N Y (Adam Demetri of counsel), for respondents.

Before: SANDRA J. FEUERSTEIN, J.P., GLORIA GOLDSTEIN, LEO F. McGINITY, STEPHEN G. CRANE, JJ.


DECISION ORDER

ORDERED that the order is affirmed, with costs.

The plaintiffs established their entitlement to partial summary judgment on the issue of liability by submitting evidence that the defendant's vehicle crossed over the double yellow line on the road into oncoming traffic and struck the plaintiff Glenn Demetri's vehicle. In opposition to the motion, the defendant submitted only an attorney's affirmation which was insufficient to raise a triable issue of fact (see Browne v. Castillo, 288 A.D.2d 415; Caso v. Behme, 282 A.D.2d 493).

FEUERSTEIN, J.P., GOLDSTEIN, McGINITY and CRANE, JJ., concur.


Summaries of

Demetri v. Mallari

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
Jun 10, 2002
295 A.D.2d 395 (N.Y. App. Div. 2002)
Case details for

Demetri v. Mallari

Case Details

Full title:GLENN DEMETRI, ET AL., respondents, v. SONIA S. MALLARI, appellant

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department

Date published: Jun 10, 2002

Citations

295 A.D.2d 395 (N.Y. App. Div. 2002)
743 N.Y.S.2d 317

Citing Cases

Residential Mortg. Loan Tr. 2013-TT2 v. Fiorita

In opposition to defendant's motion, counsel for the current plaintiff, Residential, submits an affirmation…

Marsicano v. Dealer Stor. Corp.

We reverse. The plaintiff established his entitlement to judgment as a matter of law ( see Winegrad v. New…