From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Demartini v. Demartini

United States District Court, Ninth Circuit, California, E.D. California
Sep 28, 2015
2:14-CV-02722 JAM CKD PS (E.D. Cal. Sep. 28, 2015)

Opinion

          PETER H. CUTTITTA PORTER SIMON Professional Corporation Truckee, CA, Attorneys for TIMOTHY P. DEMARTINI and MARGIE DEMARTINI.

          Michael J. DeMartini Defendant, In Propria Persona.

          Renate DeMartini Defendant, In Propria Persona.


          STIPULATION TO AMEND COMPLAINT AND COUNTER-CLAIM ORDER THEREON

          CAROLYN K. DELANEY, Magistrate Judge.

         Come now Plaintiffs, acting by and through their counsel of record, and Defendants, in propria persona, and stipulate as follows:

1. Plaintiffs shall be permitted to file the First Amended Complaint attached hereto and incorporated herein by reference as Exhibit "A", and which is the subject of their pending motion for leave to do so; and

2. Defendants/Counter-claimants shall be permitted to file the proposed Amended Answer and Counter-claim attached hereto and incorporated herein by reference as Exhibit "B", and which is the subject of their pending counter-motion for leave to do so; and

3. Plaintiffs shall have twenty (20) days from the date of the Court's Order on this Stipulation to respond to the Amended Counterclaim; and

4. Entry of the Order on this Stipulation shall not serve to vacate, or otherwise change or effect, the Court's September 3, 2015 Status (Pretrial Scheduling) Order, all of whose provisions shall remain in effect.

          ORDER

         Good cause appearing therefore, the Court Orders that:

1. Plaintiffs shall be permitted to file the First Amended Complaint attached hereto and incorporated herein by reference as Exhibit "A", and which is the subject of their pending motion for leave to do so; and

2. Defendants/Counter-claimants shall be permitted to file the proposed Amended Answer and Counter-claim attached hereto and incorporated herein by reference as Exhibit "B", and which is the subject of their pending counter-motion for leave to do so; and

3. Plaintiffs shall have twenty (20) days from the date of the Court's Order on this Stipulation to respond to the Amended Counterclaim; and

4. Entry of the Order on this Stipulation shall not serve to vacate, or otherwise change or effect, the Court's September 3, 2015 Status (Pretrial Scheduling) Order, all of whose provisions shall remain in effect.


Summaries of

Demartini v. Demartini

United States District Court, Ninth Circuit, California, E.D. California
Sep 28, 2015
2:14-CV-02722 JAM CKD PS (E.D. Cal. Sep. 28, 2015)
Case details for

Demartini v. Demartini

Case Details

Full title:TIMOTHY P. DeMARTINI and MARGIE DeMARTINI, Plaintiffs, v. MICHAEL J…

Court:United States District Court, Ninth Circuit, California, E.D. California

Date published: Sep 28, 2015

Citations

2:14-CV-02722 JAM CKD PS (E.D. Cal. Sep. 28, 2015)