holding that it was not plain error to limit Santos to illegal gambling cases
Summary of this case from U.S. v. HalsteadNo. 09–281.
2009-10-13
Roger DEMAREST, petitioner, v. UNITED STATES.
Case below, 570 F.3d 1232.
Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit denied.
holding that it was not plain error to limit Santos to illegal gambling cases
Summary of this case from U.S. v. HalsteadFull title:Roger DEMAREST, petitioner, v. UNITED STATES.
Court:Supreme Court of the United States
Date published: Oct 13, 2009
In reconciling the plurality opinion with Justice Stevens's concurrence, certain of our sister Circuits have…
U.S. v. HalsteadOne group has concluded that the five justices in the Santos majority agreed that the term "proceeds" means…