Opinion
2014-05-21
Curtis D. DEANE v. Amy Day KAHN et al.
Wesley W. Horton, Brendon P. Levesque, Hartford, and Thor Holth, in support of the petition. Sean P. Clark, Kerry R. Callahan, Hartford, and Lloyd L. Langhammer, Norwich, in opposition.
Wesley W. Horton, Brendon P. Levesque, Hartford, and Thor Holth, in support of the petition. Sean P. Clark, Kerry R. Callahan, Hartford, and Lloyd L. Langhammer, Norwich, in opposition.
The plaintiff's petition for certification for appeal from the Appellate Court, 149 Conn.App. 62, 88 A.3d 1230, is granted, limited to the following issues:
“1. Did the Appellate Court properly reverse the judgment of the trial court enforcing a right-of-way by deed on the ground that the plaintiff failed to prove its location or use?
“2. Did the Appellate Court properly reverse the judgment of the trial court enforcing a right-of-way by implication or necessity on the ground that the plaintiff failed to prove what use was made of the right-of-way at the time the riverfront portion of the property became effectively landlocked?”