Opinion
1058N
May 6, 2003.
Order, Supreme Court, Bronx County (LaTia Martin, J.), entered on or about May 30, 2001, which (1) upon the parties' respective motions to partially reject a Special Referee's report, granted plaintiff's motion for an upward modification of defendant's $100 weekly maintenance obligation only to extent of directing defendant to pay an additional $100 per week and to provide plaintiff with health insurance, and (2) denied plaintiff's motion to hold defendant in contempt for defaulting on his original maintenance obligation, unanimously affirmed, without costs.
John F. McHugh, for plaintiff-appellant.
Before: Buckley, P.J., Nardelli, Mazzarelli, Sullivan, Gonzalez, JJ.
The challenged modification in maintenance reflects a proper balancing of plaintiff's substantial change in circumstances due to deteriorating health and defendant's ability to pay for plaintiff's new needs (Domestic Relations Law § 236[B][9][b]), and is otherwise substantially supported by the record (see Golden v. Golden, 228 A.D.2d 184). Plaintiff's contempt motion was properly denied based upon credible evidence of defendant's inability to pay his original maintenance obligation due to college tuition expenses. We have considered plaintiff's other arguments and find them unavailing.
THIS CONSTITUTES THE DECISION AND ORDER OF THE SUPREME COURT, APPELLATE DIVISION, FIRST DEPARTMENT.