From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Delgado v. State

COURT OF APPEALS THIRTEENTH DISTRICT OF TEXAS CORPUS CHRISTI - EDINBURG
Feb 20, 2014
NUMBER 13-13-00684-CR (Tex. App. Feb. 20, 2014)

Opinion

NUMBER 13-13-00684-CR

02-20-2014

NELSON GARCIA DELGADO, Appellant, v. THE STATE OF TEXAS, Appellee.


On appeal from the 332nd District Court

of Hidalgo County, Texas.


MEMORANDUM OPINION


Before Chief Justice Valdez and Justices Benavides and Longoria

Memorandum Opinion Per Curiam

Appellant, Nelson Garcia Delgado, pro se, filed a notice of appeal on November 25, 2013, from the "October 16th [O]rder Denying his Pro Se Motion Seeking the Appointment of Counsel To Present Arguments of An Ineffective Assistance of Trial Counsel Claim In An Article 11.07 Writ of Habeas Corpus Proceeding." On December 11, 2013, appellant filed an additional pleading regarding this attempting notice of appeal. We dismiss the appeal.

On December 17, 2013, the Clerk of this Court notified appellant that it appeared that the order at issue was not appealable. Appellant was advised that the appeal would be dismissed if the defect was not corrected within ten days from the date of receipt of the Court's directive. Appellant did not file a response to the Court's directive.

A defendant's notice of appeal must be filed within thirty days after the trial court enters an appealable order. See TEX. R. APP. P. 26.2(a)(1). Generally, a state appellate court only has jurisdiction to consider an appeal by a criminal defendant where there has been a final judgment of conviction. Workman v. State, 170 Tex. Crim. 621, 343 S.W.2d 446, 447 (1961); McKown v. State, 915 S.W.2d 160, 161 (Tex. App.—Fort Worth 1996, no pet.). Exceptions to the general rule include: (1) certain appeals while on deferred adjudication community supervision, Kirk v. State, 942 S.W.2d 624, 625 (Tex. Crim. App. 1997); (2) appeals from the denial of a motion to reduce bond, TEX. R. APP. P. 31.1; McKown, 915 S.W.2d at 161; and (3) certain appeals from the denial of habeas corpus relief, Wright v. State, 969 S.W.2d 588, 589 (Tex. App.—Dallas 1998, no pet.); McKown, 915 S.W.2d at 161.

Our review of the documents before the Court does not reveal any appealable orders entered by the trial court within thirty days before the filing of appellant's notice of appeal. The Court, having examined and fully considered the notice of appeal and pleadings filed by appellant, is of the opinion that there is not an appealable order and this Court lacks jurisdiction over the matters herein. Accordingly, this appeal is DISMISSED for lack of jurisdiction. All pending motions, if any, are likewise DISMISSED.

PER CURIAM Do not publish.
See TEX. R. APP. P. 47.2(b).


Summaries of

Delgado v. State

COURT OF APPEALS THIRTEENTH DISTRICT OF TEXAS CORPUS CHRISTI - EDINBURG
Feb 20, 2014
NUMBER 13-13-00684-CR (Tex. App. Feb. 20, 2014)
Case details for

Delgado v. State

Case Details

Full title:NELSON GARCIA DELGADO, Appellant, v. THE STATE OF TEXAS, Appellee.

Court:COURT OF APPEALS THIRTEENTH DISTRICT OF TEXAS CORPUS CHRISTI - EDINBURG

Date published: Feb 20, 2014

Citations

NUMBER 13-13-00684-CR (Tex. App. Feb. 20, 2014)

Citing Cases

Delgado v. Lumpkin

On February 20, 2014, the appeal was dismissed as untimely and insofar as the denial of the motion for…