From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Delassus v. Tracy

Supreme Court of Ohio
Sep 14, 1994
70 Ohio St. 3d 218 (Ohio 1994)

Summary

In DeLassus v. Tracy, 70 Ohio St.3d 218, 218, 638 N.E.2d 528, 529-30 (1994), the court held that the fact that a corporate officer "was required to obtain the permission of [another person] for payment of any corporate obligation by check" did not relieve the officer from personal liability for.unremitted sales tax collections.

Summary of this case from Schmehl v. Helton

Opinion

No. 93-759

Submitted April 14, 1994 —

Decided September 14, 1994.

APPEAL from the Board of Tax Appeals, No. 91-M-904.

Sundorph Aeronautical Corporation failed to pay Ohio sales taxes during the periods of January through April 1983, February through May 1984, July and August 1984 and October 1984 through February 1985. During that period and until the fall of 1987, John DeLassus was President of Sundorph. He also owned twenty-five percent of the shares of stock of the corporation, was a member of the board of directors, and was a substantial creditor, having advanced money for Sundorph's use.

On June 28, 1991 the Tax Commissioner assessed DeLassus $56,265.74 for personal liability for the unpaid sales taxes, as a responsible corporate officer of Sundorph, under R.C. 5739.33. DeLassus appealed to the Board of Tax Appeals ("BTA") and testified as the only witness at an evidentiary hearing. The BTA affirmed the assessment.

The cause is now before this court upon an appeal as of right.

Kenneth P. Frankel, for appellant.

Lee Fisher, Attorney General, and Duane M. White, Assistant Attorney General, for appellee.


DeLassus challenges the assessment and the decision of the BTA by asserting that (1) he was not the responsible officer of Sundorph, (2) he had no discretion with regard to the payment of obligations of Sundorph, including sales tax, and (3) he was not responsible because the BTA had determined in an earlier personal liability action involving Donald Evans, successor president of Sundorph, that Robert Bennett was the responsible officer under R.C. 5739.33. We reject appellant's contentions.

As we said in Spithogianis v. Limbach (1990), 53 Ohio St.3d 55, 57, 559 N.E.2d 449, 451:

"The General Assembly intended through the enactment of R.C. 5739.33, to hold those officers or employees who are in charge of the operations of a defaulting corporation personally liable for unpaid sales tax if such person filed returns or paid taxes, or controlled or supervised others who performed those tasks, or had responsibility for such tasks."

Under the facts of this appeal DeLassus is within the purview of that statute.

His most compelling argument is that he was required to obtain the permission of Robert Bennett for payment of any corporate obligation by check. Also, DeLassus, relying on Smith v. Limbach (1992), 64 Ohio St.3d 473, 597 N.E.2d 94, says that the bare title of president, and nothing else, does not make him liable under the statute.

However, this appeal involves more than a bare title. The record discloses that DeLassus did sign Ohio Sales Tax Returns as well as checks prepared for him by another Sundorph employee. The fact that Bennett may have reserved the right to decide which checks should be paid does not negate that apparent authority.

As to Evans' release from liability and the BTA's earlier finding that Bennett was a responsible officer of Sundorph, the obligations of R.C. 5739.33 do not create mutually exclusive responsibilities; the broad scope of the statutory language encompasses more than one officer or employee, and contemplates personal liability for those who prepare tax returns, or make tax payment, or supervise those who do. Spithogianis, supra, 53 Ohio St. 3 d at 57, 559 N.E.2d at 451.

In Willis v. Lindley (1980), 61 Ohio St.2d 356, 15 O.O.3d 438, 402 N.E.2d 1185, we upheld the personal liability of a corporate officer under R.C. 5739.33 where his corporation had borrowed money from a bank which prohibited payment of any bills other than those authorized by the bank. Cf. Lenart v. Lindley (1980), 61 Ohio St.2d 110, 15 O.O.3d 152, 399 N.E.2d 1222.

The BTA found that DeLassus was the president and a shareholder of Sundorph, made financial contributions requested of shareholders, was aware of the corporation's statutory duty to pay sales tax, and supervised persons preparing sales tax returns and signed returns as well as checks in payment of corporate debts; and found that he "has the requisite responsibilities, by virtue of his ownership, title and authority in Sundorph * * *." Thus, the BTA decided that DeLassus was personally liable for unpaid sales taxes under R.C. 5739.33 as "having control or supervision of or charged with the responsibility of filing returns and making payments."

Since the decision of the BTA was neither unreasonable nor unlawful, it is affirmed.

Decision affirmed.

MOYER, C.J., A.W. SWEENEY, DOUGLAS, WRIGHT, RESNICK, F.E. SWEENEY and PFEIFER, JJ., concur.


Summaries of

Delassus v. Tracy

Supreme Court of Ohio
Sep 14, 1994
70 Ohio St. 3d 218 (Ohio 1994)

In DeLassus v. Tracy, 70 Ohio St.3d 218, 218, 638 N.E.2d 528, 529-30 (1994), the court held that the fact that a corporate officer "was required to obtain the permission of [another person] for payment of any corporate obligation by check" did not relieve the officer from personal liability for.unremitted sales tax collections.

Summary of this case from Schmehl v. Helton
Case details for

Delassus v. Tracy

Case Details

Full title:DELASSUS, APPELLANT, v. TRACY, TAX COMMR., APPELLEE

Court:Supreme Court of Ohio

Date published: Sep 14, 1994

Citations

70 Ohio St. 3d 218 (Ohio 1994)
638 N.E.2d 528

Citing Cases

SQS Foodstores v. Tracy Tax Commr. of Ohio

Id. at 57.{¶ 25} As both the vendor and the entity who submitted the convenience store's tax returns to the…

Schmehl v. Helton

In Copeland v. Robinson, 25 Kan.App.2d 717, 970 P.2d 69 (1998), where personal liability for unpaid taxes was…