From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Deering v. State

Supreme Court, Appellate Division, Fourth Department, New York.
Nov 15, 2013
111 A.D.3d 1368 (N.Y. App. Div. 2013)

Opinion

2013-11-15

Lee–Ann DEERING, Claimant–Appellant, v. STATE of New York, New York State Thruway Authority and New York State Department of Transportation, Defendants–Respondents.

Appeal from an order of the Court of Claims (Jeremiah J. Moriarty, III, J.), entered*851January 9, 2012. The order denied the motion of claimant for permission to file a late claim. Law Office of William Mattar, P.C., Williamsville (April J. Orlowski of Counsel), for Claimant–Appellant. Eric T. Schneiderman, Attorney General, Albany (Paul Groenwegen of Counsel), for Defendants–Respondents.


Appeal from an order of the Court of Claims (Jeremiah J. Moriarty, III, J.), entered*851January 9, 2012. The order denied the motion of claimant for permission to file a late claim.
Law Office of William Mattar, P.C., Williamsville (April J. Orlowski of Counsel), for Claimant–Appellant. Eric T. Schneiderman, Attorney General, Albany (Paul Groenwegen of Counsel), for Defendants–Respondents.
MEMORANDUM:

In a proposed action to recover damages for injuries she allegedly sustained in a motor vehicle accident, claimant appeals from a January 2012 order denying her motion for permission to file a late claim pursuant to Court of Claims Act § 10(6). That order was entered “without prejudice” to a further application by claimant. The Attorney General has informed this Court that the Court of Claims, by an August 2013 order, granted claimant permission to file a late claim. Because the August 2013 order affords claimant “all the relief she seeks and ... thus renders the appeal moot” (Matter of Dye v. Bernier, 104 A.D.3d 1102, 1102, 961 N.Y.S.2d 814), this appeal must be dismissed ( see Matter of Gasparro v. Edwards, 85 A.D.3d 1222, 1222 n., 925 N.Y.S.2d 206 ;see generally Matter of Cucinella v. New York City Tr. Auth., 82 A.D.3d 1453, 1454, 918 N.Y.S.2d 761).

It is hereby ORDERED that said appeal is unanimously dismissed without costs.

SMITH, J.P., CARNI, SCONIERS, and VALENTINO, JJ., concur.


Summaries of

Deering v. State

Supreme Court, Appellate Division, Fourth Department, New York.
Nov 15, 2013
111 A.D.3d 1368 (N.Y. App. Div. 2013)
Case details for

Deering v. State

Case Details

Full title:Lee–Ann DEERING, Claimant–Appellant, v. STATE of New York, New York State…

Court:Supreme Court, Appellate Division, Fourth Department, New York.

Date published: Nov 15, 2013

Citations

111 A.D.3d 1368 (N.Y. App. Div. 2013)
2013 N.Y. Slip Op. 7582
974 N.Y.S.2d 850

Citing Cases

Lehmann v. Edm Lenox, LLC

In the amended order, the motion court granted in part plaintiffs' motion for reargument on procedural…

Cellino Law, LLP v. Looney Injury Law PLLC

While this appeal was pending, however, the court entered a subsequent order granting plaintiffs'…