Opinion
CASE NO.: C 13-0104 RS
03-27-2013
PEDRO DECTOR AND FLORIBERTO PEREZ OJEDA and all others similarly situated, Plaintiffs, v. CITY OF ROHNERT PARK, ROHNERT PARK DEPARTMENT OF PUBLIC SAFETY and DOES 1-5, inclusive, Defendants.
STEVEN C. MITCHELL, ESQ., SBN 124644 ROBERT W. HENKELS, ESQ., SBN 225410 GEARY, SHEA, O'DONNELL, GRATTAN & MITCHELL, PC. Attorneys for Defendants CITY OF ROHNERT PARK and ROHNERT PARK DEPARTMENT OF PUBLIC SAFETY
STEVEN C. MITCHELL, ESQ., SBN 124644
ROBERT W. HENKELS, ESQ., SBN 225410
GEARY, SHEA, O'DONNELL, GRATTAN & MITCHELL, PC.
Attorneys for Defendants
CITY OF ROHNERT PARK and ROHNERT PARK
DEPARTMENT OF PUBLIC SAFETY
ORDER
STIPULATION TO EXTEND TIME FOR
DEFENDANTS CITY OF ROHNERT
PARK AND ROHNERT PARK
DEPARTMENT OF PUBLIC SAFETY TO
RESPOND TO COMPLAINT;
STIPULATION REQUESTING
RESETTING OF CASE MANAGEMENT
CONFERENCE
TO THIS HONORABLE COURT:
Pursuant to Northern District Local Rule 6-1, the parties, through their respective counsel, agree and stipulate as follows:
1. Defendants CITY OF ROHNERT PARK and ROHNERT PARK DEPARTMENT OF PUBLIC SAFETY filed a Motion to Dismiss plaintiffs PEDRO DECTOR and FLORIBERTO PEREZ OJEDA's Complaint on February 22, 2013. In response, plaintiffs filed a First Amended Complaint on March 14, 2013.
2. The date currently set for defendants to respond to plaintiffs' First Amended Complaint is April 1, 2013.
2. To provide sufficient time for defendants to respond, the parties hereby agree and stipulate that the time for defendants CITY OF ROHNERT PARK and ROHNERT PARK DEPARTMENT OF PUBLIC SAFETY to respond to plaintiffs' First Amended Complaint in the above titled case shall be extended to April 16, 2013 .
3. This extension of time for defendants to respond does not alter the date of any event or deadline already fixed by this Court.
4. A Case Management Conference is currently set for April 11, 2013. The parties agree that the pleadings will not likely be settled by that time and that it is therefore advisable, in the interest of preserving the resources of the parties and the court, to reset that conference to a later date. The parties therefore propose that the Case Management Conference be reset to sometime in July or later so as to allow for any motions to be heard and the pleadings to be settled prior to any Rule 26 conference.
IT IS SO STIPULATED.
By _________________
MARK T. CLAUSEN
Attorneys for Plaintiffs
PEDRO DECTOR and FLORIBERTO PEREZ
OJEDA
GEARY, SHEA, O'DONNELL, GRATTAN &
MITCHELL, P.C.
By _________________
ROBERT W. HENKELS
Attorneys for Defendants
CITY OF ROHNERT PARK and ROHNERT
PARK DEPARTMENT OF PUBLIC SAFETY
ORDER
The Case Management Conference currently set for April 11, 2013 is reset to (date) July 18, 2013, at (time) _ 10:00 a.m. __ in Courtroom 3, 17th Floor of the U.S. District Court for the Northern District of California -San Francisco. A Joint Case Management Conference Statement shall be filed seven (7) calendar days before the new date.
_________________
United States District Court Judge