From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Decorators v. Perazzo

Supreme Court, Appellate Term, Second Department
Oct 25, 1999
182 Misc. 2d 806 (N.Y. App. Term 1999)

Opinion

October 25, 1999

Harold, Salant, Strassfield Spielberg, White Plains (Jerold Rotbard of counsel), for appellant.

McCarthy, Fingar, Donovan, Drazen Smith, L. L. P., White Plains (Deborah Yurchuk McCarthy of counsel), for respondents.


OPINION OF THE COURT

Memorandum.

Order unanimously modified by denying that branch of the motion that sought dismissal of plaintiff's action for the reasonable value of work, labor and services rendered and remanding the matter to the court below for all further proceedings on said cause of action; as so modified, affirmed without costs.

Plaintiff, a licensed home improvement contractor, instituted this action to recover the balances due for work, labor and services performed on the subject premises and to foreclose on a mechanic's lien filed against said premises. The court granted defendants' CPLR 3212 motion dismissing the action noting that since plaintiff engaged non-licensed independent contractors to perform the work, it was precluded from enforcing its contract with defendants (see, Westchester County Administrative Code §§ 863.312, 863.313)

The purpose of requiring a home improvement license is so that the owner has an entity that can be held accountable for any abuses and fraudulent practices (see, Westchester County Administrative Code § 863.311). Here plaintiff, a licensed contractor, is in direct privity with the owners-defendants and therefore accountable in breach of contract for any and all damages. In view of the foregoing, the cause of action for work, labor and services can be maintained even though the sub-contractors were not licensed. The action to foreclose on the mechanic's lien was properly dismissed as the City Court lacks jurisdiction to entertain such actions (see UCCA 203; Lien Law § 41; Fedoryk v. Fort Salonga Mgt. Co., 56 Misc.2d 513;Bowerman v. Stahl, 92 N.Y.S.2d 842).

DiPAOLA, P.J., INGRASSIA and FLOYD, JJ., concur.


Summaries of

Decorators v. Perazzo

Supreme Court, Appellate Term, Second Department
Oct 25, 1999
182 Misc. 2d 806 (N.Y. App. Term 1999)
Case details for

Decorators v. Perazzo

Case Details

Full title:WESTCHESTER DECORATORS, INC., Appellant, v. JOHN E. PERAZZO, et al…

Court:Supreme Court, Appellate Term, Second Department

Date published: Oct 25, 1999

Citations

182 Misc. 2d 806 (N.Y. App. Term 1999)
701 N.Y.S.2d 820

Citing Cases

Polar Bear Mech., Inc. v. Walison Corp.

The District Court is a court of limited jurisdiction and has only such powers and jurisdiction as are…