From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

DeBowes v. DeBowes

Supreme Court of Florida. En Banc
Oct 5, 1942
9 So. 2d 632 (Fla. 1942)

Opinion

August 4, 1942 Rehearing Denied October 5, 1942

An appeal from the Circuit Court for Dade County, Stanley Milledge, Judge.

H.H. Taylor and Tiffany Turnbull, for appellant.

Carl T. Hoffman, Hoffman Robinson, Arnold A. Ross and J. Lewis Hall, for appellee.


Pursuant to the granting of petition for rehearing in this cause we have reconsidered the record herein and a majority of the Court has reached the conclusion that no reversible error appears in the record and that, therefore, the decree appealed from should be affirmed.

It is also determined that the publication of the majority opinion and the dissenting opinion heretofore filed can serve no useful purpose.

It is, therefore, ordered that those opinions shall remain in the record in this cause but shall not be published either in the Florida Reports or the Southern Reporter.

So ordered.

BROWN, C. J., BUFORD, ADAMS and CHAPMAN, JJ., concur.

WHITFIELD, TERRELL and THOMAS, JJ., dissent.


Summaries of

DeBowes v. DeBowes

Supreme Court of Florida. En Banc
Oct 5, 1942
9 So. 2d 632 (Fla. 1942)
Case details for

DeBowes v. DeBowes

Case Details

Full title:ERMA DEBOWES v. RAY O. DEBOWES

Court:Supreme Court of Florida. En Banc

Date published: Oct 5, 1942

Citations

9 So. 2d 632 (Fla. 1942)
9 So. 2d 632

Citing Cases

DeBowes v. Debowes

THOMAS, J.: In a suit instituted in Dade County a decree was entered in favor of the plaintiff, Ray O.…